![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhudf2mIGwdgAWiyS1Eqbj731vO3syQmH6So7VwhhbI2ewgrNbhDAbOFGeWEyxrZmX3NH1vQZpoZbTH-cP4ZDgoQhW8rADXKSPRhX6k7rZ8C_wDYbWDW2nQEj3_MMAcRg6nOzyco1VRu4E/s400/CNN%252520International%252520Desk%25252003-11%25252018-00-44.jpg)
.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiQfXlK8zBM_d99SXpXlFVwXhCVNiY3Mbc_Bi0QVxUStNStyxBJw9VjIfTcUK5KENtqQEpv1CQ8dfV8dhfNaW3JwjTqFDcCICOYWzi8u6oySs6lfm9MRQggqi2D5-ZIplZdM0vgwwVf9yE/s400/wisconsin_protests_1_109214621.jpg)
.
Simply put, is it asking too much that modern journalists can cover more than one story at a time? Or do they simply flit from one story to the next, whichever one they think will garner the highest ratings? People, this has to change. If we can't depend on the press to cover the most important stories in our lives, and continue to cover them even when they're no longer "sexy", then we're all screwed.
No comments:
Post a Comment